SC: Improper Land Registration, No Registration At All
The Supreme Court in its recent decision once more emphasized that registration of instruments must be done in the proper registry in order to effect and bind the land.
The High Court categorized the proper registry upon which instruments should be registered. It declared that "prior to the Property Registration Decree of 1978, Act No. 496 (or the Land Registration Act) governed the recording of transactions involving registered land, i.e., land with a Torrens title. On the other hand, Act No. 3344, as amended, provided for the system of recording of transactions over unregistered real estate without prejudice to a third party with a better right. Accordingly, if a parcel of land covered by a Torrens title is sold, but the sale is registered under Act No. 3344 and not under the Land Registration Act, the sale is not considered registered and the registration of the deed does not operate as constructive notice to the whole world."
Thus, a buyer of land may not be characterized as a buyer in bad faith for having bought the titled property notwithstanding the registration of the first Deed of Absolute Sale under Act No. 3344. "An improper registration is no registration at all. Likewise, a sale that is not correctly registered is binding only between the seller and the buyer, but it does not affect innocent third persons", the High Court finally ruled. (Mactan-Cebu International Airport Authority vs. Sps. Tirol and Ngo, G.R. No. 171535, June 5, 2009) [Atty. Joan Therese F. Boma]



